Sunday, April 24, 2016

Every rape is fair & acceptable when it's Cinema.. CBFC approved.

RAPE... An extremely inhuman, disgusting act that's haunting not just India but the entire world & speaking on behalf of fellow concerned Indians, it's a grave issue, which we all have been failing to handle.

When our film writers take up this issue to present in their films... it's all about getting it closer to reality, over exaggerate the insult the girl or her family might face, giving instant justice to the girl at least unrealistically just to please us frustrated viewers who have failed the victims in reality. Yes, mostly these scenes are forcefully inserted in a screenplay just to give a proper hero elevation scene where our hero gets to show his anger, disgust, disappoint & use all those emotions to take matters into his own hands. Just like everyone of us feel like doing when the system fails us. A need to raise above the system & get the justice on our own. My question is, how long will you want to exploit this feeling among viewers? If the answer is as long rapes keep happening then the answer is wrong in every which way.

I just want to point out few films in last few months, that have seriously misused this issue for nothing. The exception is made for Puri Jagannadh directorial movie called Temper & that entire movie revolved around one rape victim. Tried to use the Nirbhaya incident in it's favour. I'm not condemning this movie considering the issue was integral part of the script. My particular problem was with Kick 2, Theri & Sarrainodu.

In Kick 2, villain's son wants to take over his dad's position. The other henchmen mock him at his dad's party, saying he isn't man enough to take that position or even have the guts to kill. Frustrated guy gets drunk, pounces on an innocent girl serving food at the party & rapes her in front of everyone. Why? because he wanted to prove he's a man. While everyone watches, he bashes her head & kills her. Why? because he wanted to prove he has the guts to kill. Just a scene to deliberately create a melodrama between the victim's mother & the hero in the very next scene where she tries to hide this fact from the hero. Later the hero gets to know about it in the climax which makes him bash all the baddies which he was always going to do anyways. That's it, the very purpose of that brutal scene was only this.

Coming to Theri.. I'll admit as a viewer while watching, even I liked the scene. Not the rape, but the actions of the hero. Clear example of exploiting our emotions. What I didn't like about this U rated film was the detailing in the dialogue where the doctor explains what was inserted inside the girl's private part to destroy evidence. Yes, we have loads of crime story shows telecasting on various tv channels, various press reports letting out more details than required.. Honest question related to ethics, what was the point going into such details? Why did CBFC rated it U? I said I'll exclude Temper, but even there the torture scenes weren't cut. CBFC had just ordered to show those scenes in black & white. Girl gets tied & beaten up with belt, gets drilled, acid poured on her, tortured & raped for 42 days... U/A rating only demanded the scene where hero kills the rapists to be trimmed by 30%-40% but not the torture. What's with this special treatment by CBFC when it acts all butt-hurt over adult comedies or even words like saala?

Onto the third film, Sarrainodu. Personally I'm disgusted with the rape scenes but Sarrainodu took it way too far. The girl is killed by her abuser. After she dies, the guy rapes her. Why? Just so that the girl's parents can emotionally say "sachi poyina vadaledhu (didn't leave her even after she died)". Ofcourse this is followed by a court scene where the dead girl's character gets assassinated to an extent where even the 80s films' court scenes will be put to shame. All of this just to show hero getting angry & then he chops off the limbs of the rapist. Writer expects, the audience are happy now that justice is done. REALLY?

I don't care who blabbers about women empowerment, women's safety in movies. But when you take up an issue & try to take advantage of it, where's your ethics? You've written a lead character which requires to be glorified. Most of our commercial films tend to be patriarchal. We want our heroes to solve all our problems on screen. We want our heroes to get angry at all the issues we get angry at. We want our heroes to do things which we common people are not allowed to do or don't take enough courage to do. All that is understandable for decades now. But the moment you've fully understood the seriousness of the situation/issue then to see it being used so lightly, doesn't go down well. Honestly, the above 3 films I spoke about, if you remove those rape episodes from the screenplay, nothing would've happened to the film. Neither will the hero look weaker. Any writer or as a matter of fact any person should stick to his/her ethics & stand by their principles.

I had still not made up my mind to speak up until I stumbled upon a recommended video on youtube last night. A Telugu movie again & that scene forced me to speak up. NO, I don't approve CBFC rating this film. It's highly unacceptable to have such scenes. Reality or not, film maker should be socially responsible & so does the Censor Board. I'll let you watch that "wonderful" scene & decide it for yourselves.


My conscience is intact. Where is your's?

Friday, April 22, 2016

Sarrainodu - Mandatory beheading & chopping of limbs, typical Boyapati Sreenu film that disappoints.

Story -

Gana (Allu Arjun) is ex-military who doesn't have any other job but just to get himself involved in fights against baddies. Dhanush (Aadi) is the real baddie among all baddies, who does various atrocities & is a kingpin of sorts. Dhanush is all about his image & Gana hates anybody that brags about their image. Rakul Preet plays the damsel in distress, building the bride between Gana & Dhanush. What happens when they two clash forms the story.

Movie -

The template is simple. Opening act, introduce the villain (Aadi), followed by introduction of the hero (Allu Arjun). One is completely evil while the hero is equally evil for the baddies. There's Brahmanandam for comic relief. Catherine Tresa as MLA as well as love interest of Allu Arjun is therefore introduced for the love angle & ofcourse for the songs. The pace remains okayish throughout. Rakul Preet Singh contributes to the hero elevation scene in the interval block.

Post interval, the routine formula of flashback is opted which narrates the story of Rakul Preet & her family. The reason for the conflict between her & Aadi is established. Not surprisingly, once the flashback ends, Allu takes over the conflict. This is followed with scenes of more heroism. The pace remains flat throughout the second half, no matter how much scenes are forcefully added just for hero elevation. No place for logic in this film & there's no prize for guessing this.

Performances -

Allu Arjun in an out & out massy role looks dedicated. Rakul Preet is okay in her role. Catherine Tresa doesn't get much to do. Aadi is a good actor but has a painfully ill-written role. Srikanth does good in his limited role. Brahmanandam is wasted as usual & also his comedy doesn't work here. Saikumar is hardly there. Pradeep Rawat is shown as a joker. Jayaprakash as Allu Arjun's dad is first rate. Vinaya Prasad hardly gets a dialogue despite playing hero's mother. Suman appears in two scenes. Devadarshini tries to be funny but in a way those scenes are racist.

Plusses - 
1. Allu Arjun's energy.
2. Movie is filled with 6 action scenes. For a typical Boyapati Sreenu's audience, it might be a treat.
3. Some humour (intended & unintended) towards the climax.

Minusses -
1. Extremely violent. For an U/A film, Boyapati Sreenu makes sure he inserts a beheading & chopping of limbs as seen in his previous films.
2. What's with the rape scene in all the recent films? Nope, may be a decade back it was helpful to show heroism but now it's just disgusting. And all other films it's rape & murder but in this film, the girl gets killed first & then gets raped. This I refuse to call as creativity or even a necessity. Utterly disgusting.
3. Songs are not good.
4. For a change, one of the heroine is an MLA & hero gets to stalk her & harass her in the name of love. The whole thing comes out super fake even for a forgettable commercial entertainer template. Hard to digest.
5. Villain's character is once again very badly written one. Why waste good talented actors on such roles?
6, Gets tedious & boring quickly.

My Rating - 1.5/5 (This time no leniency.)

Final Words - This typical Boyapati Sreenu film disappoints.

Friday, April 15, 2016

Fan - Rehne De... Tu Nahin Samjhega.


Story - 

Gaurav a die hard fan of Aryan Khanna, calls himself as the Junior Aryan Khanna from Inder Nagar, Delhi. He has let Aryan Khanna grab the major part of his life & his only aim in life is to meet his idol in person. What happens when he tries to meet his idol? What happens when his obsession takes a dangerous turn? What happens in this battle of Star vs Fan? The answers to this forms the entire film.

Movie -

The first half is decent paced as it firmly establishes the character of Gaurav. Best thing about the first half is it has been kept as realistic as possible. The journey of Gaurav from Delhi to Mumbai has been very well handled & the moment when Gaurav watches Aryan Khanna for the first time is captured superbly. The character of Gaurav is so well written that even his personality speaks to the audience. He's an obsessed fan but a shy lover yet he's an over enthusiastic kid when it comes to his idol. The twist in the tale & the plight of Gaurav when he doesn't understand why he's being punished is yet another master-stroke. The first half ends on an emotional high.

The second half straight away falters by trying to follow the predictable path. Despite that, the intentions of the writer & director is pretty clear. The references between Aryan & Gaurav is well drawn here. The shock in Aryan's face when he fails to understand why he's being punished  is another master-stroke. But then the writers decide to take it too far & the film loses the touch of reality, going completely against the tone set by the first half. The pace considerably dips big time here as there isn't much suspense left. The film picks up towards the climax as once again the two main characters clash & this time it's the emotional clash rather than plain chasing.

The ending was spoiled to me already thanks to the miscreants in the social media. It did lose it's impact but also the predictability of the screenplay in the second half had it's fair share in lowering the impact.

Performances - 

Shah Rukh Khan is at his best as both Gaurav & Aryan Khanna. It's a treat to watch him especially as Gaurav. There are certain moments in first half & towards the end of second half where he just steals the show.  Waluscha D'Souza hardly has anything to do. In fact the supporting cast looked good on screen but they had nothing much to do as the entire film relied only on Gaurav & Aryan.

Plus - 
1. Shah Rukh Khan's bravura performance.
2. The scene where Gaurav watches Aryan outside Mannat for the first time.
3. The jail scene in the first half.
4. The same scene with Aryan in second half in London. Like I said the reference is perfectly made.
5. Gaurav's reaction in the pre-climax.
6. Role reversal. It's not always Gaurav stealing the show, Shah Rukh Khan shows his control as Aryan Khanna too.

Minus -
1. Becomes completely unrealistic in the second half.
2. They took it too far in the second half. Morally it was unacceptable to see Aryan get insulted to such extent.
3. The movie has his heart in the right place but it does go against the film in major scenes post interval resulting in logic take the back seat.
4. Predictability.

Also, the first half of the film set such high standards that second half found it to be impossible to match it.

My Rating - 3/5 (Just for Shah Rukh Khan.)

Final Words - Rehne De... Tu Nahin Samjhega.

Thursday, April 14, 2016

Theri - A predictable entertainer that just about works.



Story - 

Joseph Kuruvilla (Vijay) & his daughter Nivi (Nainika) are living in Kerala. The cute girl's teacher Annie (Amy Jackson) is impressed over Joseph. As she tries to get closer to him, certain hidden secrets start creeping up. He's not who he says he is. Now who is Joseph Kuruvilla? Who is Vijay Kumar? What is it that Joseph is hiding in order to protect his daughter? The answers to these questions forms the entire film.

Movie -

Initial reels start of on a simpler & heart warming note establishing the father & daughter characters with their cute little antics. Joseph is the one who stays away from any controversies. Annie (Amy Jackson) hits a goon for misbehaving which leads to the goons running over Annie & Nivika with their car. Annie lodges FIR against the goons & Joseph Kuruvilla's true hidden identity starts to creep up.

The film is completely formulaic masala entertainer that relies on the flashback as the true backbone to the entire screenplay. All in all, it's a simple revenge story that sticks to the basics. The pace of the first half of the film is good as it has enough comedy elements & commercial action elements with proper build up to the hero. The story turns serious with the rape episode & it's handled effectively. The interval ends on a high note yet again for Vijay starrer.

Post interval, the pace dips as it travels through the predictable path. The logic takes a back seat. The flashback scenes once again takes up major screen time in the second half too. Thankfully, there are no extra songs here just for the sake of the presence of another heroine. The last half an hour of the film totally pleases the fans & action film lovers as Atlee delivers what he promised to give in this Vijay starrer.

Performances - 

Vijay is THERIFIC in his role of Vijay Kumar & Joseph Kuruvilla. He has handled both the shades extremely well along with his trademark antics. Samantha Ruth Prabhu is decent. Amy Jackson doesn't impress & gets limited screen space. Radhika Sarathkumar impresses whenever she appears on screen. Prabhu Ganeshan gets hardly any scope to perform. Motta Rajendran uses the given opportunity ably. 

Special Mention to Nainika playing Vijay's daughter. She's a show stealer, extremely cute & lights up the screen every time. Meena's daughter is destined to have a great future. Mahendran has given another THERIFIC performance as the main villain of this film. The ace director shines & looks ever menacing throughout.

Plus - 
1. Vijay & Nainika chemistry.
2. Strong interval block.
3. Very well shot action scenes. Infact more credit to the cinematographer for the quality product.
4. The last half an hour.
5. Tamil directors know to create extra sentiment to tragic scenes. But what works this time is the proper timing of the dialogues.

Minus -
1. Extremely predictable film. In fact there's no suspense left whatsoever 10 minutes into the movie.
2. Amy Jackson looks uncomfortable throughout.
3. Songs don't work at all. Kudos to Atlee to not have an extra song in the second half instead the dance number between Vijay & Amy Jackson is shown in the end credits.
4. A bit too violent themed for a U certified film.

My Rating - 3/5 (Extra 0.5 just for Baby Nainika, she's way too adorable especially her cute dialogue delivery.)

Final Words - A predictable entertainer that just about works. On the other hand, treat for the fans who were extremely disappointed with Puli.

Friday, April 8, 2016

The Jungle Book - The best cinematic experience of 2016 so far.


It's always fun to see our beloved characters come alive on the big screen. It's not just about the nostalgia or our love for the characters / story, it's about taking that journey to the magical land & for those 106 minutes living with those characters. A brilliant novel achieves & despite the visual aid, we rarely see a cinema perfectly achieve this. The Jungle Book falls into those rare list of films.

This 1894 novel has consistently mesmerized generations with it's captivating story & heart touching characters, making our childhood feel like as adventurous as Mowgli's life in the jungle through it's various adaptations through films or tv-series. The world has kept on changing for better & The Jungle Book has stayed on to be the better story each time. Be it the 1942 version or the 1967 animated version, the journey this story takes us has been the same.

Now in the era dominated by CGI & motion capture, this epic story & beloved characters deserved this technology. Mowgli, Bagheera, Baloo, Kaa, Shere Khan, Raksha, Akela are alive on screen & apart from the technology, it's the stupendous voice over by stellar star cast which includes, Bill Murray, Sir Ben Kingsley, Idris Elba, Scarlette Johansson, Lupito Nyong'o, Christopher Walken & ofcourse Neel Sethi, the young kid all provide the soul to the characters. Thanks to Jon Favreau for doing superb justice to this story, doing the needful changes to the tone of the film. It's a lot darker than we knew The Jungle Book as yet it stays as heart touching & full of fun as ever.

This version of The Jungle Book is a visual treat. I just for fun, re-watched the 1942 & 1967 version films before watching this 3D re-telling of the tale. Having known this story for over 2 decades now & also having re-watched the older gems once again this week, I still felt like being exposed to the characters for the first time. I felt the characters emotions as if it was the first time. This is the magic of cinema. Hats off to the cast & crew for this.

May be I went with the mindset of not wanting to be critical towards this movie. I bought the ticket & just let myself in on the journey of Mowgli. Every other character Mowgli encounters instantly made a connection. May be I didn't want the makers to change the story much. I just wanted The Jungle Book I knew. We're going to have yet another Jungle Book movie next year, so let the changes happen in that version.

Plus -
1. The riveting CGI.
2. Voice over by the stellar cast.
3. Neel Sethi as Mowgli.
4. Initial scenes showcasing the relationship of Mowgli with Raksha, his wolf mother.
5. Shere Khan's entry.
6. Baloo teaching the Jungle song to Mowgli.
7. The entire King Louise episode.
8. Stunning visuals that included landslide.
9. The Elephants.
10. Basically the entire Jungle.

Minus - 
1. The pronunciation of the characters names by the western actors. Also certain words like bandar-log is more relevant as a hindi word to us but it's pronunciation disappoints. Probably the Hindi dubbed version would do more justice to it.
2. Wanted a bit more attention given to Akela. I'm just greedy here.
3. The pace drops a bit in the second half but is made up by action packed climax.
4. As usual didn't enjoy 3D much. May be IMAX 3D would offer something better.

My Rating - 4/5

Final Words -  A visual spectacle indeed.

Sardaar Gabbar Singh - 163 mins long video of self propaganda. Thattukovadam kashtam ra babu.


Story - 
Rattanpur is a village that still has a royal family with their internal feuds. There's a royal villain (Sharad Kelkar), a helpless princess (Kajal Aggarwal) & enters a maverick cop (Pawan Kalyan) who will save the helpless princess as well as the helpless people of the village from the royal villain.

Movie -
Since it's routine screenplay sticking to the basics, the film starts with introducing Sardaar Gabbar Singh as an orphan kid followed by the scenes reserved to establish Bhairav Singh (Sharad Kelkar) character through his heinous atrocities. Following this is the entry of the hero Sardaar Gabbar Singh (Pawan Kalyan) in Indo-Nepal region, ofcourse just for an action scene & an opportunity for Pawan Kalyan to say "Entire India is my jurisdiction". Anyways, the ways of Sardaar results in him getting transferred to Rattanpur. Now that the two characters are introduced, time for the princess Arshi (Kajal Aggarwal) to make her appearance in a scene right away trying to prove how helpless she is. Anyways blah blah comedy.... blah blah comedy in the name of romance.... blah blah an item song featuring Raai Laxmi... blah blah heroism... The stage is set... Bhairav Singh lusts for Arshi whereas Sardaar & Arshi are in love. blah blah, a forced accident scene involving kids to create sentiment for the well hyped interval bang.

Post interval, Bhairav Singh seeks revenge, Sardaar wants to help in things that doesn't concern him (what's the point of him mediating in selling the palace to a businessman, he's a cop for heaven's sake. But again it gives an opportunity to Pawan Kalyan to speak about CSR - Corporate Social Responsibility. Well he knows things people, remember it during next election) & as usual Arshi falls head over heels every time Sardaar shows some heroism. Blah blah comedy, well Brahmanandam is there so can't help. Suddenly, the love affair of Sardaar & Arshi gets revealed, she's royal blood, he's an orphan.. ergo from a lower caste. Oh why! Well an opportunity for Pawan Kalyan to speak up for lower caste people, you can guess the speech.

Enter the final act, Bhairav Singh over powers Sardaar in his own cunning way. Sardaar who is supposed to be more cunning, just doesn't see it coming & falls for the trap. While Sardaar grunts like every honest cop proving himself to be not corrupt, one thing leads to another, Bhairav Singh & Arshi's marriage is fixed. Anyways, during the Sangeet ceremony Sardaar goes there to plead forgiveness (?!) instead he's asked to entertain by dancing only because Bhairav Singh forgot to invite Shah Rukh Khan to perform. Let me admit, the whole Sangeet episode is the highlight of the film just like the antakshari scene in the prequel, Gabbar Singh. Sudden twist leading to action filled climax where it only takes one punch for our hero to win. Seriously?!

Oh yeah, Raja Sardaar Gabbar Singh continues.... Are they really gonna make the third part?

Performances -
Pawan Kalyan show all the way. Kajal Aggarwal looks pretty. Sharad Kelkar tries to look menacing. Brahmanandam tries to be funny. Urvashi succeeds in being funny. Ali is wasted & so is Tisca Chopra. Mukesh Rishi gets a decent role. Sanjjanaa in an almost dialogue less role. Long list of actors who've nothing much to do.

Plus -
1. Pawan Kalyan
2. Sangeet scene. Pawan Kalyan dancing to the songs of Megastar was super fun.

Minus -
Way too many to list.

My Rating - 2/5 (1 star for Pawan Kalyan, 0.5 for the comedy & 0.5 for everybody's dedication to complete remaining 70% shoot since this January)

Final Words - 163 mins long video of self propaganda.